Gun Rights Across America State Pages
Gun Rights Across America State Pages
Defending the constitution, standing for faith and freedom, and defending the people! Fight with faith first, follow prayer, and take a stand!
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Honoring "GUNS ACROSS AMERICA" Missouri Supporters & Speakers
Guns Across America-Missouri
https://www.facebook.com/ResistTyrannyAmerica
Show Me Patriots
https://www.facebook.com/groups/306022849516708/?ref=ts&fref=ts
Upcoming Events
https://www.facebook.com/ResistTyrannyAmerica/events
American Gun Owners.
Armed, trained, and peaceful.
We believe exactly that. Gun Control, does result in drastic crime increases. Statistics prove that time and time again. Chicago is the perfect example. A city with the strictest gun laws in the nation, had 532 homicides in 2012. Australia has had their violent crime skyrocket, after their gun ban. The tragic Columbine shooting happened with so called "assault weapons," during the Clinton "assault weapons" ban. So much for gun control resulting in lower crime!
If somebody wants to do harm to another, they'll find a way. Whether it be a knife, gun, bat, pipe, wrench, or a rock! Imposing useless, and proven ineffective gun laws on American citizens, accomplishes one thing. It creates defenseless victims.
According to world renowned criminologist Dr. Gary Kleck from Florida State University, guns are used to stop some form of criminal assult approximately 650,000 times per year! That's roughly 12,500 times per week! Dr. Kleck further elaborates that a net decrease in firearms availability, does NOT yield any decrease in homicide, suicide, assault, rape, or burglaries. Actually, the exact opposite occurs. Dr. Kleck has determined that it actually creates substantially more victims.
We live in a world full of wonderful people. But we also have some evil people living among us. Please don't think that restricting firearms will cause violent crime to decrease. That's as big of a fantasy, as our world being filled with fairy god mothers, and unicorns.
Lawful gun owners use their weapon reluctantly and only in the gravest of danger. They exercise skill and discipline with their defensive training. Unlike police, a lawful gun owner will never give you a speeding ticket or tax you to provide you with protection.
Responsible gun owners have always acted as peacekeepers in society.
We acknowledge our responsibility to our well-being, and those around us. We acknowledge that laws are not followed by criminals, and valiantly stand opposed to restrictions on the tools we legally use for defense.
American Gun Owners.
Armed. Trained. Peaceful.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Friday, January 18, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
JANUARY 19 “GUN APPRECIATION DAY”
NEWS RELEASE
Second Amendment Foundation
12500 NE Tenth Place • Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 454-7012 • FAX (425) 451-3959 • www.saf.org
BROAD COALITION OF GUN RIGHTS, CONSERVATIVE GROUPS PROCLAIM JANUARY 19 “GUN APPRECIATION DAY”
For Immediate Release: 1/7/2013
Washington, D.C. – A new coalition of gun rights and conservative groups has proclaimed January 19, 2013, “Gun Appreciation Day” (GAD) and begun urging Americans nationwide to show their support for gun ownership by turning out en masse at gun stores, ranges, and shows from coast to coast.Scheduled to send a message to Washington two days before Obama’s second inauguration, the “Gun Appreciation Day” is expected to rival “Chick-fil-A Day” as a public statement of protest against government policies.
Gun rights movement leader Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation and chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms stated, “ We need to ban politicians who assault our rights not firearms that are used thousands of times a day to protect lives and property from criminal attack.”
“The Obama administration has shown that it is more than willing to trample the Constitution to impose its dictates upon the American people,” said Gun Appreciation Day chairman Larry Ward, president of Political Media, Inc. “If the American people don’t fight back now, Obama will do the Second Amendment what he has already done to the First with Obamacare – gut it without a moment’s thought to our basic constitutional rights.”
The Gun Appreciation Day currently includes the following coalition members: Second Amendment Foundation, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Special Operations Speaks, Revolution PAC, Citizens and Country, Social Security Institute, Committee to Draft Judge Andrew Napolitano, Conservative Action Alerts, Women Warriors PAC, Conservative Action Fund, and Political Media, Inc. Additional organizations are expected to join in the days ahead.
Gun Appreciation Day member organizations are urging their supporters to line up “around the block” at gun stores, gun counters, gun shows, and gun ranges to protest the Obama administration’s post Sandy Hook assault on gun rights. The organizations expect to reach more than 50 million Americans over the next two weeks in support of the Gun Appreciation Day online, on air and in their members’ inboxes.
“We have never had a president who so callously disregards the Constitution, Congress, the courts, and the will of the American people,” Ward said. “And that’s why this outpouring of public support is so important for our constitutional safeguards to keep and bear arms. If, as this president claims, the American people are at risk from murderous rampagers, the logical solution is to arm, not present a docile target.”
The GAD website can be found at http://gunappreciationday.com/
-END-
A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY TO THINK ABOUT
December 29, 2012 marked the 122nd Anniversary of the murder of 297 Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. These 297 people, in their winter camp, were murdered by federal agents and members of the 7th Cavalry who had come to confiscate their firearms “for their own safety and protection”. The slaughter began after the majority of the Sioux had peacefully turned in their firearms. The Calvary began shooting, and managed to wipe out the entire camp. 200 of the 297 victims were women and children. About 40 members of the 7th Cavalry were killed, but over half of them were victims of fratricide from the Hotchkiss guns of their overzealous comrades-in-arms. Twenty members of the 7th Cavalry's death squad, were deemed “National Heroes” and were awarded the Medal of Honor for their acts of [cowardice] heroism.
We hear very little of Wounded Knee today. It is usually not mentioned in our history classes or books. What little that does exist about Wounded Knee is normally a sanitized “Official Government Explanation”. And there are several historically inaccurate depictions of the events leading up to the massacre, which appear in movie scripts and are not the least bit representative of the actual events that took place that day.
Wounded Knee was among the first federally backed gun confiscation attempts in United States history. It ended in the senseless murder of 297 people.
Before you jump on the emotionally charged bandwagon for gun-control, take a moment to reflect on the real purpose of the Second Amendment, the right of the people to take up arms in defense of themselves, their families, and property in the face of invading armies or an oppressive government. The argument that the Second Amendment only applies to hunting and target shooting is asinine. When the United States Constitution was drafted, “hunting” was an everyday chore carried out by men and women to put meat on the table each night, and “target shooting” was an unheard of concept. Musket balls were a precious commodity and were certainly not wasted on “target shooting”. The Second Amendment was written by people who fled oppressive and tyrannical regimes in Europe, and it refers to the right of American citizens to be armed for defensive purposes, should such tyranny arise in the United States.
As time goes forward, the average citizen in the United States continually loses little chunks of personal freedom or “liberty”. Far too many times, unjust gun control bills were passed and signed into law under the guise of “for your safety” or “for protection”. The Patriot Act signed into law by G.W. Bush, was expanded and continues under Barack Obama. It is just one of many examples of American citizens being stripped of their rights and privacy for “safety”. Now, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is on the table, and will, most likely be attacked to facilitate the path for the removal of our firearms, all in the name of “our safety”.
Before any American citizen blindly accepts whatever new firearms legislation that is about to be doled out, they should stop and think about something for just one minute — evil does exist in our world. It always has and always will. Throughout history evil people have committed evil acts. In the Bible one of the first stories is that of Cain killing Abel. We can not legislate “evil” into extinction. Good people will abide by the law and the criminal element will always find a way around it.
Evil exists all around us, but looking back at the historical record of the past 200 years, across the globe, where is “evil” and “malevolence” most often found? In the hands of those with the power, the governments. That greatest human tragedies on record and the largest loss of innocent human life can be attributed to governments. Who do the governments always target? “Scapegoats” and “enemies” within their own borders…but only after they have been disarmed to the point where they are no longer a threat. Ask any Native American, and they will tell you it was inferior technology and lack of arms that contributed to their demise. Ask any Armenian why it was so easy for the Turks to exterminate millions of them, and they will answer “We were disarmed before it happened”. Ask any Jew what Hitler’s first step prior to the mass murders of the Holocaust was- confiscation of firearms from the people.
Wounded Knee is the prime example of why the Second Amendment exists, and why we should vehemently resist any attempts to infringe on our Rights to Bear Arms. Without the Second Amendment we will be totally stripped of any ability to defend ourselves and our families.
Saturday, January 12, 2013
2nd Amendment Rally - Jefferson City, Missouri Capitol - Jan, 19th NOON
Guns Across America - Missouri - 2nd Amendment Rally - Jefferson City, Missouri Capitol
Saturday, January 19, 2013. 12:00pm.
-The event will be at noon, in front of the Capitol in Jefferson City. -There is a parking garage located at 200 Madison Street, Jefferson City, MO. There may also be additional parking along adjacent streets. -Please bring creative signs! -Please be respectful, especially if we are confronted. We are here to show that we are responsible people who are standing for our rights. We do not want to give people the wrong impression about us. So far, there is not a pre-demonstration rendezvous. We can easily set that up if there is a demand. PLEASE invite everyone you can! Our strength is in numbers. We need to show Missouri that we are MANY!
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Police & Military - Time to Choose
You took an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. The congress, the senate and the executive branch have made themselves into a domestic enemy, and they are going to attempt to use you to help them in their push to eliminate the 2nd amendment.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
You’re Being Propagandized, Programmed and Pacified
Propagandize, Program and Pacify – the Three P’s of despotic rule — and the DC’vers are wildly successful at it. Let’s examine their tactics and learn why we’re in heap big trouble if we let it continue.
Propaganda (n) - information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution or nation.
Propaganda is a primary tool in the elected official’s toolbox. In a liberated society, in contrast with a no-holds-barred despotic society like North Korea, the people must be gently prodded to accept more and more control by a national government. The average DC’ver uses various tools of propaganda to accomplish this. Here is a partial list, broken into two categories, with examples of more recent propaganda emanating from the DC’vers in DC:
Positive Propaganda
1. Investment vs. taxation – Confiscation of productive people’s income is the lifeblood of despotic rule. Throughout history, military might, direct confiscation, arbitrary law, and the like were used to confiscate property. In a Union like the United States that was once governed by the Rule of Law–that Law being the Constitution–there is a heritage of consent of the governed. The government can only take that which is consented to by a free people. So, DC’vers, wanting to enhance their rule over others, their status, and their fringe benefits, must find a way to get the people to consent to having their property taken.This must be done in ways that won’t alarm people who love freedom.Thus, we’re told that the confiscation of our property is an “investment,” a word scrubbed of any odor of taxation. We understand investment in houses, 401Ks and education will secure us a good future. Every evening we’re bombarded with TV commercials telling us this. The national government, which is able to adapt to maintain their rule over others, their status, and their fringe benefits, piggybacks on this term. So, SCHIP is an “investment” in children’s health, they tell us. Wind power is a good government “investment”. When we pay by force of law into the Ponzi scheme called Social Security, we’re not being taxed, no; we’re “investing” in our future retirements. The DC’vers have propagandized us that the money confiscated from us every two weeks is an innocuous “investment” in our fellow citizens, or in more modern times, such “investment” as a good and patriotic thing, helping the poor, building schools, defending our nation. Either way, you’ve been propagandized.
2. It’s your civic duty – This propaganda teaches us to accept the size and scope of national government power as a condition of being a good, upstanding, and patriotic inhabitant of the Union. A free and moral people generally have a good grip on justice; what’s right is right we say. We believe that honesty is still an important value, so it’s not hard for the DC’vers to persuade us to turn on our neighbor. We see this every April 15th when the news comes out that billions of dollars are “owed” to the national government by citizens who don’t pay their taxes. Citizen after citizen will call into talk shows berating these people as tax cheats, tax frauds, unpatriotic, even anti-American–without ever stopping to think about what they’re defending. Rather than ask what Constitutional authority is there for SCHIP, Medicare, Social Security, EPA, DHS, Department of Agriculture, and the likes which make up the national government, we shame and criticize people who don’t like their property confiscated.And so, through this propaganda, the DC’vers accomplish two purposes: they deflect the citizens’ anger which they deserve for attaching our paychecks, and they recruit agents for their cause of maintaining their rule over others, their status, and their fringe benefits: We the People!
3. We have a “federal” government – We’re comforted by the word “federal” when attached to government. This hearkens back to our primary school years when we were first exposed to the founding of the Union, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the creation of the “federal government”. But because so little accurate history has been taught for generations now, we’re no longer able to discern the difference between national and federal government. Indeed, there was a time when the government was federal…but no longer.So, what is a “federal government”?First, we are not a “nation” as we understand other nations like France, Germany or Australia. We are a Union of separate and sovereign States. But you’ve not been taught that and neither was I; I had to go find this out for myself.
A federation is a union of self-governing entities. The United States of America was chartered in the Constitution as a federation of self-governing states, operating within a system of checks and balances where equal authorities keep each other from exceeding their powers. The two separate and distinct authorities are the federal government and the state governments, which are kept in check by the written legal framework of the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights. This system is also referred to as the Rule of Law.
There are both vertical and horizontal checks and balances. This is an essential and critical part to understand, failure to recognize these distinctions places all the power in the hands of the national government. When properly functioning, the three branches of the federal government (horizontally) have the authority to prevent the others from overstepping their Constitutional boundaries. When these internal horizontal checks fail, it is the duty of the states to check the federal government (vertically) via the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution; the so-called “reserve” powers, and Article V State Called Amendment Convention of the exercising the unalienable right of the people to free association, called secession.
These are the three “vertical” tools the States have to check a federal government.When the states fail to challenge the excesses of the federal government, over time, we move from a federative system to a national government. Checks and balances are weakened and eventually lost. This is the condition of the United States today. There is no longer a federal government, but a national government that bends the legal framework to support its own growth. The national government is currently free to do whatever it pleases to the people comprising the 50 separate and sovereign States. These are just the facts, unpleasant as they are.Yet, for the DC’vers to hold onto their rule over others, their status and their fringe benefits, they repeat the propaganda, “we’re a federal government and what we’re doing in Congress, the White House and the Supreme Court is authorized by the Constitution.” And we go about our business believing them when nothing could be further than the truth.
4. The mythic oath of office, pomp, and circumstance – Every two and four years, we’re treated to a spectacle of another group of elected officials taking their seats in Congress or the White House or both. There is much fanfare surrounding these events: parties, parades, ceremonies, speeches. Each element of the events are cleverly choreographed to deliver maximum comfort that the “peaceful transition” of power was accomplished and the newest group of officials will guide the Federal Government (read national government) the next two or four years.
Central to this propaganda event is the oath of office, administered to every elected official. Each oath contains certain terms to assure the populace that adherence to the Rule of Law will continue:”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter;So help me God.”But, do we ever stop and wonder whether or not the people raising their right hand, placing their left on the Bible and uttering a few words actually keep their oath? There is little evidence that the DC’vers actually do or even intended to. Perhaps there’s some wiggle room in the phrase “uphold,” “defend,” “preserve,” “support”? Maybe, assuming you’re looking for wiggle room, but isn’t that the exact problem?
Everyone likes a loophole if it benefits them; we’re all subject to human nature. But, shouldn’t character help us to overcome these natural urges; especially when the actions taken by a governing body may affect millions of people?If the primary purpose of the majority of the DC’vers is self-aggrandizement, why do we believe them when they take their oath? Do their oath match their record? If the oath is meant to pledge allegiance to the Rule of Law, why don’t we actually do something when they break it? After all, as Jefferson so eloquently put it in the Declaration of Independence, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Did you consent to having your property, and liberty taken by people who could care less about an oath?
5. The Constitution-waving elected official – A more recent propaganda trick, thanks to the Tea Party, is the constitution-waving candidate. They’re trying hard to convince you that they “honor” this document, though the reality is, most know next to nothing about it…and why should they need to? As discussed above, we no longer have a federal government constrained by a written constitution; we have a national government wielding arbitrary power with the illusion of Constitutionality.And there is no better prop than whipping out the Constitution at a campaign rally. Or mentioning it, along with a couple of Founders’ quotes, during a speaking engagement. This propaganda tool depends on the average person having little to no knowledge of the document; and this is largely true of Americans now.
6. The visualization of power, Washington DC – Do you ever wonder why House Representatives and Senators like to have buildings, bridges, highways and legislation named after themselves? Or how about all the monuments in the Capitol? All contribute to the propagation of an idea: we’re a nation, and its leaders are the DC’vers. We tend to view these “monuments” with a certain awe because of the size and design. We emotionally connect to the power of a 40 ft Abe Lincoln, or a all white marble majestic Capitol Building or White House. Powerful acronyms like the FBU, CIA, NSA all speak to the power of the “national” government. We’re subtly asked to embrace these emblems and in doing so, take with them a sense of power. All of it pointing back the Washington DC, the “Nations” Capitol.
7. The illusion of legality of all laws – Do you believe all laws are legal? If you do, you’ve fallen prey to one of the biggest frauds the DC’vers perpetrates on the masses. Read Jefferson’s words in the Kentucky Resolution and ask yourself if you agree or disagree.
“That they will concur with this commonwealth in considering the said acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States (not merely as the cases made federal, casus fœderis but), in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shalt be exercised within their respective territories.”
Jefferson makes the case quite clearly, if a law is made that is not authorized by the Constitution these laws (Acts) are “void, and of no force”. Bet you weren’t taught that in high school were you? No, the DC’vers who desire to rule over others, maintain their status, and their fringe benefits need you to believe everything they do is lawful. Pssst…folks, most of what we fear from the government is unethical, immoral, and based in ZERO Constitutional Authority. How’s that sit with you?
Negative Propaganda
1. Well-placed news stories intended to scare us – We’ve all seen them: “the IRS raided so and so’s home after they were charged with being delinquent on their taxes…stay tuned for the full story at 11:00!” Or,“Tonight, on Gold Rush, watch as the MSHA inspectors close down Dakota Fred’s mining operation.” While not directly placed by the national government, they nonetheless achieve their desired goal: to scare the heck out of the masses by visually showing them that if you cross the national government, you can lose everything.Ask yourself, where in the Constitution are the DC’vers authorized to have created MIOSH in the first place? But we never ask these questions, no, we watch this travesty and probably get a little angry, but we also might say to ourselves, “glad that wasn’t me!” And another seed of negative propaganda has just affected how we think about the national government.2. Taking advantage of a crisis – This is a particularly insidious tack the national government takes, so well-summarized by Rahm Emmanuel, who said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Under the influence of an impossible assertion–“we’ll protect you”–we are scared by a crisis into handing over our liberties. Consider the TSA. No one argues that radical Islamists pose a threat and there needs to be security at airports. But we never ask, “is there a better way to secure our aircraft than being felt up, radiated, or strip-searched before we get on the plane?” No, we dutifully submit to the DC’vers who are probably sincere in their desire to secure aircraft but have knee-jerk reactions like “let’s nationalize airport security”. Does anyone ever stop to wonder whether or not there is ANY Constitutional authority to do this? And perhaps, is there a better, safer, more convenient way to handle airport security? Of course there is.
3. Invasion of privacy – We’re bombarded almost daily with news stories about this or that agency tracking cellphone use, Internet behaviors, even travel and purchase habits. How much of it is true? I don’t know; probably no one does, but what matters is that it’s been ingrained in our psyche that all of us are under the watchful eye of the national government. This negative propaganda is sometimes released in a manner that provides a sense of comfort, and sometimes it is released as a warning. For example, a report issued by the Department of Homeland Security speaks of having gained information about “right-wing extremist chatter”. This Report was disseminated throughout the media and eventually caused a great uproar. But look at the three words in that phrase:
a. Right-wing – What is their definition of a “right-winger?” There’s no appendix in the report, but clearly, the DHS has a definition they’re working with. Are social conservatives right-wingers? How about 10th Amendment supporters? Or churchgoers? Or Ron Paul supporters? Who is a right-winger?
b. Extremist – What is their definition of an “extremist?” Again, no appendix, but clearly the DHS has a definition they’re working with. Are Jeffersonians and Constitutionalists extremists? Are people who oppose the Incorporation Doctrine extremists? How about people who point out the voluminous record of anti-constitutional acts by the national government? How about people who call the national government the national government? Are these people all “extremists?”
c. Chatter – A deeply troubling word. Ask yourself this: how does the DHS know about the “chatter” going on in “right wing extremist” groups? How are they monitoring this chatter?
Propaganda is a weapon that has been used for well over 150 years to pacify and terrorize a free people. I’m not suggesting there is a grand conspiracy here or some sort of “Star Chamber.” No, this is just the natural course of consolidated national governments throughout history, which are run by people who like to rule over others, maintain their status and their fringe benefits. National governments naturally end up here for self-preservation. That is why the Framers strove to create a very small, minimally-powerful federal government; they understood history, the inherent nature of men, and the inevitable path national governments take. There need not be any star chamber, just people in power that like to rule over others, maintain status and fringe benefits. This group of people, without any real coordination, will naturally steer the national government in this direction. It is instinctive to them to create more and more laws to control more and more behavior until every citizen (except themselves) is at some point breaking a law and is subject to punishment as defined by the lawmakers. Today, the lawmakers are Congressmen, the Executive Branch (via regulations) and the Supreme Court. In days gone by they were monarchs, emperors, and outright tyrants. All used threats based on a law to control people imbued with Unalienable Rights.
Propaganda is a powerful tool that has programmed us all to obey our masters in DC. Sure, we’re allowed to rally with our signs and yell through bullhorns. We’re allowed to have radio shows that complain, complain, complain…but that’s about it. Step outside of that box, or cross a national government law, and you will run foursquare into the powerful hand of the national government; not a place any of us want to be.
And they know we know that.
Program (verb used with object) – to cause to absorb or incorporate automatic responses, attitudes, or the like; condition.
Our typical elected officials are not noble people; in most instances, they possess a deep-seated desire to rule others. They are generally not trustworthy to protect Unalienable rights; in some cases out of malice and in others out of a lack of knowledge or sheer ignorance. Now to be sure, from time to time, anomalies appear, but as a rule, the people exercising power over the citizens thirst to rule over others, desire status, and to obtain fringe benefits that come from their position. They do not respect authority by and large, and cleverly seek ways around it; in relation to this article, the authority for the national body of elected officials is the United States Constitution, including the Bill of Rights.
In order to reach their objective of maintaining their rule over others, desire for status, and fringe benefits, these officials must find a way to overcome the limitations of the Constitution. The biggest threat to them is an informed and engaged electorate, thus the need to begin, as early as possible, programming the populace to accept their unconstitutional activities. All despots program the people via propaganda until pacification is achieved.
Just about all of the relations we have with government, in almost all levels, is based in a programmed response from us. In an ordered society like ours, this is to be expected. But order and respect is different from being programmed. This is why the DC’vers use disguise language like “investment” or the newest term, “revenue.” Don’t think for a moment that these words weren’t focus tested. So much of what happens at the national level is filtered through a PR Firm. Words and phrases are tested for public consumption, it is really insidious. We the People are being sold a bill of goods and we do not have the discernment to resist them.
Frank Luntz of Luntz Global makes a living advising politicians, lobbyists and special interest groups on how to “message” you on a particular policy, program or candidate. But this is only successful because we’ve been programmed to accept this, to become comfortable. To believe that if we depart from what we perceive to be the status quo, we’re on the fringe, an outsider of sorts. It is almost inherent in us to comply and the programmers know this. So, they use propaganda to reduce the chances that we’ll actually not comply. All sorts of peer and societal pressure is brought to bear until we eventually no longer consider resisting or complying. No, we just obey even though we may have that knot in our stomach. The pressure of status quo is just too strong. When this is achieved true pacification can occur in a population–and we’re almost there.
Propaganda leads to Programming leads to Pacification.
Pacification (n) – Reduction, as of a rebellious district, to peaceful submission.
The ultimate goal of despots who desire to rule over people, maintain their status and their fringe benefits is pacification and submission. The DC’vers cannot accomplish their goal of self-aggrandizement without the little people submitting to their rule; and submit we do. This is why Jefferson said, “I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” Jefferson is correct; there simply is no other way to make the government fear the people than a little rebellion from time to time. Is it messy? Yes. Risky? Yes. Fraught with danger? Yes.
But worth it? YES!
OK, ready for a test? This is easy; it’s multiple choice.
Have you been propagandized, programmed and pacified?
- When you go to your mailbox to retrieve your mail and in the stack is a letter from the IRS. Do you:
- a. Lift up your hands and thank God you’ve heard from your national government?
- b. Or, begin to feel a little increase in your heart rate, flush in the face, and a little nervous as you open the envelope?
- When you open the envelope and read the first sentence; “Dear Taxpayer, you returns for 2009 and 2010 have been selected for review by the Internal Revenue Service.” Do you:
- a. Break open a bottle of Dom Perignon because your national government has selected you for this honor?
- b. Begin to panic, lose sleep and weight, living in fear of your national government and what it can do to you because you’ve seen the well-placed stories about what happens to people when they cross the IRS?
If you answered “b” for both questions, you’ve been pacified and, willingly or unwillingly, you will submit to the national government on almost anything they chose to do to you. You may muster the courage from time to time to make a sign and go protest or attend a Tea Party rally, but when push comes to shove, deep down you are afraid of your government. And the reality is…you should be.
“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” This quote has been attributed to Thomas Jefferson but probably came from a series of debates by John Basil Barnhill. Regardless of who said this, the principle holds and I hope you embrace it.
Once you admit your own fear of the national government and the DC’vers who seek to rule over others, maintain their status, and their fringe benefits, standing up to them becomes easier. For while they can destroy your life, they cannot take your love of liberty. And until you admit your own fear, you’ll never understand an equally powerful emotion: principled courage.
In review, what is it that the DC’vers desire?
To rule over others, status and fringe benefits.
See how easy it is to use propaganda to program you?
Thursday, January 3, 2013
What You’ll See in the Rebellion
Let me explain, gun grabbers, how your confiscatory fantasy plays out. Let us imagine for a moment that a sweeping gun control bill similar to the one currently suggested is passed by the House and Senate, and signed into law by a contemptuous President.
Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim they’ve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered.
Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves.
They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush.
After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted.
Unnamed citizens and federal agents will be the first to die, and they will die by the dozens and maybe hundreds, but famous politicians will soon join them in a spate of revenge killings, many of which will go unsolved.
Ironically, while the gun grab was intended to keep citizens from preserving their liberties with medium-powered weapons, it completely ignored the longer-ranged rifles perfect for shooting at ranges far beyond what a security detail can protect, and suppressed .22LR weapons proven deadly in urban sniping in Europe and Asia.
While the Secret Service will be able to protect the President in the White House, he will not dare leave his gilded cage except in carefully controlled circumstances. Even then he will be forced to move like a criminal. He will never be seen outdoors in public again. Not in this country.
The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass would largely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, the Capitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in working against their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if they can not be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren. Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of the Republic.
You can expect congressional staffs to disintegrate with just a few shootings, and expect elected officials themselves to resign well before a quarter of their number are eliminated, leaving us with a boxed-in executive, his cabinet loyalists trapped in the same win, die, or flee the country circumstance, military regime loyalists, and whatever State Governors who desire to risk their necks as well.
Here, the President will doubtlessly order the activation of National Guard units and the regular military to impose martial law, setting the largest and most powerful military in the world against its own people. Unfortunately, the tighter the President clinches his tyrannical fist, the more rebels he makes.
Military commands and federal agencies will be whittled down as servicemen and agents will desert or defect. Some may leave as individuals, others may join the Rebellion in squad and larger-sized units with all their weapons, tactics, skills, and insider intelligence. The regime will be unable to trust its own people, and because they cannot trust them, they will lose more in a vicious cycle of collapse.
Some of these defectors will be true “operators,” with the skills and background to turn ragtag militia cells into the kind of forces that decimate loyalist troops, allowing them no rest and no respite, striking them when they are away from their most potent weapons. Military vehicles are formidable, but they are thirsty beasts, in terms of fuel, ammo, time, and maintenance. Tanks and bombers are formidable only when they have gas, guns, and can be maintained. In a war without a front, logistics are incredibly easy to destroy, and mechanics and supply clerks are not particularly adept at defending themselves.
Eventually, the government will turn upon itself. The President will be captured or perhaps killed by his own protectors. A dictatorship will form in the vacuum.
If we’re lucky, the United States of America, or whatever amalgam results, will again try to rebuild. If we’re very lucky, the victors will reinstate the Constitution as the law of the land. Just as likely though, we’ll face fractious civil wars fought over issues we’ve not begun to fathom, and a much diminished state or states will result, perhaps guided by foreign interests.
It will not be pretty. There will be no “winners,” and perhaps hundreds of thousands to millions of dead.
Yet, this is the future we face if the power-mad among us are not soundly defeated at the ballot box before they affect more “change” than we, the People, are willing to surrender to would-be tyrants.
[author's note: This article is just one of an evolving series of posts reacting to current events that many are interpreting as possible threats to our Republic and the Constitution.
Prepare To Take America Back
Fiscal Cliff Update: GOP Wants More Spending Cuts
http://www.onlywire.com/r/115321325Absolute Proof Sandy Hook was Staged
Newtown School Shooting Inconsistencies Emerging Show Sandy Hook Event May Have Been Manipulated
We feel for the families affected by this tragedy and offer our condolences.
The reason we’ve compiled this information is so that awareness can spread and prevent the next attack. We’re not saying this was a government operation of some kind, but there are inconsistencies which raise serious questions about the official narrative.
Please set aside your feelings on the gun control debate and process the fishy details of this possible manipulated event.
Before analyzing the reports of a second/multiple shooter(s), mainstream media is reporting the shooter had 2 handguns and a “long gun”.
The medical examiner says a long gun was the primary weapon.
Carver, who performed autopsies on seven of the victims, said the wounds he knew about were caused by a “long weapon.” Asked by a reporter whether the rifle was the primary weapon, he responded, “Yes.”
Watch More News Videos at ABC
|
2012 Presidential Election
|
Entertainment & Celebrity News
Multiple sources are now reporting all victims were shot multiple times, including one who was hit 11 times. That’s at least 54 hits, plus 9 more for the victim with 11? 63 hits? How many more shots were fired?
A report from the Daily News says the two handguns were the main weapons used.
Lanza, 20, did all his damage with two 9-mm. handguns after driving to the school in his dead mother’s car around 9:30 a.m., strolling inside and opening fire, authorities said.
Multiple sources are now reporting all victims were shot multiple times, including one who was hit 11 times. That’s at least 54 hits, plus 9 more for the victim with 11? 63 hits? How many more shots were fired?
Now the conflicting reports on the guns and their location(s).
Lanza was found dead next to three guns, a semi-automatic .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle and two pistols made by Glock and Sig Sauer, a law enforcement source told CNN. All belonged to his mother.
Conflicts with reports of the gun being found in the back of the car parked out front.
Lanza shot his mother, Nancy Lanza, drove to the school in her car with at least three guns, including a high-powered rifle that he apparently left in the back of the vehicle, and shot up two classrooms around 9:30 a.m. Friday, law enforcement officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
And CBS New York
Authorities found at least three guns at the scene, including a Glock 9mm and a Sig Sauer 9mm — both pistols. Also found was a Bushmaster .223 assault rifle, which was discovered in a nearby car.
And NBC News places the rifle in the back of the car.
Two 9mm handguns were recovered from the scene, an official told NBCNewYork.com. A rifle was found in the back of a car parked outside the school.
Strange enough yet? Media isn’t perfect but how do those details get crossed up?
NBC Connecticut report shows a shotgun, not a .223 rifle, being removed from the trunk and cleared.
Police were reportedly looking for a red or maroon van with a window blown out.
More videos with conflicting details
2nd man in camo pants w/ dark jacket led out of woods in handcuffs
Another man detained?
Not voluntarily let in to the school
Amateur analysis of strong evidence of 3 people involved
The blurred out face from the previous video is seen here in this one. The analysis also includes police audio.
This is all pinned on a 20 year old with Asperger Syndrome?
Signs the event is being used not just for negative sentiment towards “gun enthusiasts” and the Second amendment but now for “survivalists” also?
The gun control debate has been fed by a consistent string of fishy events starting with the shooting of Congresswoman Giffords. These events have all come against the backdrop of the UN small arms treaty being forced on America, discussed in Dec. 3rd’s discussion of Jason Whitlock’s gun comments quoted by Bob Costas on NBC’s Sunday Night Football.
The gun control debate usually comes down to public safety and the fabricated perception that the public at large can’t be trusted with guns. Recently, the debate has become extremely polarized, like the rest of popular politics, with a majority of gun control advocates calling for total bans because they are so dangerous that as a result, guns must be banned and/or confiscated.
Those sentiments have been fanned by the series of high profile gun crimes which the mainstream media will gladly scrap international geopolitical coverage for in favor of a ratings-boosting media circus. There was the shooting of Congresswoman Giffords and of course the infamous Batman shooting discussed ad nauseum. Those were followed by the timely Sikh temple shooting in Wisconsin and the NYPD shooting at the Empire State Building which the media launched into Batman style panic over, until it was found that NYPD officers fired 16 rounds that injured nine bystanders. The television media turned their back on the story before the end of the day, once details emerged about the trigger happy NYPD.
What’s lost on people is the anti-gun echo started at the top with the UN Small Arms Treaty designed to pave the way for international gun confiscation, which prompted 130 lawmakers to write a letter to President Obama requesting he not sign it as it would super-cede the constitutional protections of firearms.
Less than 30 days later, the most horrific massacre that Americans can imagine takes place? Nahhh, it couldn’t fit in with the New World Order agenda to remove individual defense capability from people, feeding a culture of victimization, under the guise of promising a utopia, could it?
Now let’s talk about psy-ops and fishy circumstances. The signs of the Giffords shooting being “inorganic” are not as clear as the planned, staged Batman Massacre.
If that sounds outlandish, we invite you to do your own reading on the matter here on the identical security drill held, here and here.
Alternatively, you can watch the video below which really breaks it down, from reporter Ben Swann of FOX19 out of Cincinnati who talks about all of the above and the multiple eyewitness reports of a second shooter..
If that sounds outlandish, we invite you to do your own reading on the matter here on the identical security drill held, here and here.
Alternatively, you can watch the video below which really breaks it down, from reporter Ben Swann of FOX19 out of Cincinnati who talks about all of the above and the multiple eyewitness reports of a second shooter..
FOX19.com-Cincinnati News, Weather
Ask yourself why the blood trail was fishy and about the second gas-mask found at the scene. Here’s more proof of past staged crimes.
Survivalists?
The aunt described her as something of a survivalist. She said she worried about economic collapse and had been stockpiling. Several people have told us previously that she did have a collection of guns, that she knew how to use them, that she enjoyed them and that also both of her sons learned how to shoot.
Other details and rumors
The father, Peter Lanza is “Tax Director and Vice President at GE Energy Financial Services”, seen here. There are rumors that Peter Lanza was supposed to be involved in the LIBOR scandal investigation, one the biggest cases of financial fraud in history, those appear to be completely sourceless chatter. There’s nothing that stands out immediately as fishy, but GE is notorious for paying very little tax, recently paying $0 in federal taxes on $14 billion in profits in 2010. More details will begin to come out as this is just unfolding.SANDY HOOK “BUSTED WIDE OPEN!!!” [VIDEO]
First off I would like to thank the users that contributed to this
video, including IDAHOPICKER, MAX MALONE and OneTruth4Life. this is not
meant to offend anyone but merely to raise questions that need to be
answered. I am not pointing the finger because there is too much
confusion, but it seems something is going on!
LINKS:
Helicopter footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9YwnXAtm4k
Multiple Shooters: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7pT0nKxgqY
Medical Examiner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV3KYBS64R8
Gene Rosen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alp64daGTSo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFyexz_IuHE
Facebook Page DEC 10: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyJ0Nl5lpOg
Robbie Parker: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKWgCRBR5qE
Obama Pics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSnhYMaGYuY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHv_RhVgfUQ
FEMA drills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlWi97yBRAc
Sites up before shooting : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSUAXBChnbE
Nurse Sally Cox - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIz-Nx_RV0g
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)